Showing posts with label M of the P. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M of the P. Show all posts

18 November 2012

A Double-header Master of the Precious/Gravity Well Post-strava-ganza


For those of you hop-ons who haven’t been a part of a Master of the Precious ceremony yet, it’s pretty simple.  Each decade (with the exception of the 2010’s, but they haven’t closed out yet), some author has one the Hugo Award multiple times.  Until now, SF has suffered over the indecision regarding which of the author’s titles was the better book.

After reading through each decade, I alone have acted as the supreme arbiter of taste and reason.  Much as I do in the case of the three Deathmatches, I bring the world the most important answers. 

After that, I think I’ll throw in the Gravity Well too.  Why not.

The 1980’s brought us a near-record number of repeat winners.  Somehow I was able to procrastinate this long without talking about any of these so here goes, the ultra-super-mega MoP showdown featuring C.J. Cherryh, David Brin, and Orson Scott Card.  Some of these comparisons will be easier than others and I’ll start with the easiest.

C.J. Cherryh:
1989 – Cyteen

This one is a no-brainer.  Do I need to justify it?!  Alright then…

Cyteen is now one of my *all-time* favorites.
Cyteen scored of the few perfect HEP scores of 25 that I have ever given out.
Cyteen is a million times more compelling.
I actually cared about Cyteen’s characters whereas I can’t name very many from Downbelow Station anymore.


When it comes to C.J. Cherryh’s Hugo winners from the 1980’s:
Cyteen is clearly the Master of the Precious.



And while I still admit Downbelow deserves a re-read, I have to say it:
Downbelow Station is just a stupid, fat Hobbit.

David Brin:
1984 – Startide Rising
1988 – The Uplift War

This one is a bit harder.

The goofy factor is a tough one, but I think I have to give it to the Dolphins of Startide Rising.
Future-gadgetry, alien-ness, and all-around coolness of stuff is really hard to call.  The Orca was pretty BA in Startide Rising, but that’s about the only thing that clearly surpasses Uplift War.  So I’m giving that non-category to The Uplift War.
HEP scores are tied!
The tie breaker has to go to The Uplift War for the more intense depiction of another species struggling with the most horrific and depressing aspects of the human condition, if you can call it that anymore.

I really hate to have to call this one, but you know I must.


When it comes to David Brin’s Hugo winners from the 1980’s:
The Uplift War is the Master of the Precious.



Which of course means (and no one is allowed to be mad at me for saying this):
Startide Rising is just a stupid, fat Hobbit.

Orson Scott Card:
1986 – Ender’s Game

And the hardest of all.

Ender’s Game wins on HEP scores.
Speaker for the Dead was clearly more intellectually stimulating.
One time when I was listening to Ender’s Game, I was so impressed that I was pounding the passenger seat in the car.
Another time when I was listening to Speaker, I actually said, “wow” all extra breathy and reverentially (to be fair, then I asked myself, “did I just say that?”).

This is starting to feel like comparing apples and oranges.

I listened to both of these as audiobooks and while both were pretty high quality, Ender’s Game was the clear winner.
Ender’s Game had more of a page-turner factor.
Speaker for the Dead kept making me think of the Foundation series.
Speaker for the Dead elicited very strong emotions.

Hey people.  I don’t know how to do this so I’m gonna call it like this: in the future, if I’m going to pick up a OSC title to re-read, it is very unlikely that it will be Speaker for the Dead.

Before I say it, know that these are two very different books and very hard to compare.  Nevertheless, I can’t have history waffling over this for centuries so here goes.


When it comes to Orson Scott Card’s Hugo winners from the 1980’s:
Ender’s Game is the Master of the Precious.




Insert frantic qualifier:
Speaker for the Dead is just a stupid, fat Hobbit.


##    ##    ##



So, I normally dedicate an entire post the Gravity Well Award, but this one is a little more clear cut than is usual.  As you know, this can mean different things in different decades but the winner of the 1980’s Gravity Well covers just about any possible meaning.

There were a number of titles that were pretty hard-hitting or gritty or depressing or philosophical or depressingly philosophical or hard science or (what you might call) hard theology or just plain difficult to read.

Only one title captured all of that.

Cyteen, as you know, destroyed my precious reading schedule (though it may have had help from my stupid training schedule and I think I might read it faster next time).  Maybe less theological discussion than others, but certainly as emotionally draining as anything I’ve ever read.  There are few books that I can confidently place within my top-5 of all time, but this is one of them.

I still can’t get over the concept of tape sessions and deep sets.  I actually regularly refer to really thorough examinations/investigations of any kind as deep sets now (even if only to myself).

Slavery, cloning, sex crimes, murder, planetary sabotage, genetics, raising a horse, children in live-ammo military training.  I’m not sure I can even think of everything that qualifies this one, but man.  Just…man…

I’d be happy to admit that there were actually quite a few titles from the 1980’s that would have been fighting pretty hard for the Gravity Well.  The 1980’s, apart from being the decade of the 600+ page book, was also the decade of debilitating tension and anxiety.  SF was really livin in the 80’s.

Still, Cyteen was really something else and I have no trouble naming it, The Gravity Well.

08 June 2012

Zelazny...


I have been dreading this post for a long time now.  It should have been weeks ago that I arbitrated over yet another Master of the Precious determination.  The contenders: This Immortal v. Lord of Light.  They were two very different experiences and I willingly admit that this forum of blazing through books each week was not conducive to an appropriate and fair reading of LoL.  So how do I make this determination?

I will make note of a couple of things.  First, TI has aged very well.  I recall that it was difficult to get into, but now my only recollection is that it was insanely fun.  I am confident that TI would re-read very well.  LoL has also aged well, though not even close to TI and while I think it would fare much better in a re-read, it will definitely require some time to mull over.  LoL was thick not in size but in concepts, theology, mysticism and mythology.  In that way it would appear LoL is at an advantage since TI was a much more straight-forward and plain story.  I just can’t get over how much fun TI turned out to be though.

I’m reluctant to get too deep into this one since it seems LoL is clearly the better fighter in this match, but as a result didn’t train thoroughly enough.  With EXTREME RELUCTANCE I have to call this a TKO by This Immortal.  If you never got around to reading the review (or the book for that matter), do it now.  It doesn't feel right to say, but I guess that means in this case, LoL is just a stupid, fat hobbit.just a stupid, fat hobbit.


I know this will disappoint some, but I have to base my decision on my experience during the challenge, and with that in mind LoL was left lacking.  I’d put money on Lord of Light in a rematch though…

15 May 2012

Who's A Stupid, Fat Hobbit Now?


I've been a little remiss lately.  I haven't had time to get on the blog as often as I'd like and I've been a little disappointed with my reviews lately.  As I sat thinking about which books are in the running for The Gravity Well and whether I've missed anything, I realized I forgot to announce the 1960's Master of the Precious award for R. A. Heinlein's three Hugo Winners.  If you missed any of these reviews, here they are:




The best HEP Score came from TMHM, which was also one of the highest scores in general.  Really though, if you read my reviews, the choice is simple here.  Starship Troopers was good.  Not great, not terrible, and as I said in my recommendation -- his philosophy was rather limp and mostly fell flat.  SiaSL was amazing at first.  Mike's transition to Earth was captivating and hilarious.  I actually barked out laughing like an idiot quite a few times.  But then, the second half of the book becomes so preachy and most of the dialogue is just an excuse for Heinlein to lecture for pages at a time that it was very near unbearable.  

TMHM stood out in a league of it's own.  Even after reading this book just under a year ago, I still enjoyed just about every minute and it was easy to place in the as yet nearly uninhabited paragon list.  TMHM was so much better, I'm not even going to bother dragging this out.  You know it.  I know it.  



So there it is.  When it comes to Heinlein’s 1960’s Hugo Winners -- The Moon is a Harsh Mistress is the true Master of the Precious.

Which also means Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land are the Frodo and Samwise of stupid, fat Hobitdom.  What's Tater's Precious?

06 March 2012

Master of the Precious


Okay, it’s time to hand out the most important unofficial title in the world:  The Master of the Precious.  This probably shouldn’t require any explanation, but there are a number of occasions throughout this challenge in which one author received two awards in the same decade.  Clearly the interweb not only needs but desires that I exercise my authority as supreme arbiter and make a final determination as to which of those titles is the real Master of the Precious.


Let’s take a closer look at the HEP SCOREs.

Here, DS apparently won by exactly one point.  In fact, every score is actually the same except DS received one more point (‘5/5’) for the Social/Political Climate than FITS.  The nature of the looming political collapse, the kidnapping by rival political factions and the difficulty everyone had adjusting to Lorenzo’s presence all justified the higher score.

Every other HEP SCORE was identical, even the scientific wonders, which was kind of surprising.  There was one category though in which one book clearly outshone the other.  I have remarked before that one of Heinlein’s crowning achievements is his ability to create characters that I want to marry, so it’s only fitting that the characters should be the category to really tip the scales.  Both books received ‘5/5’ scores, but if my feet were really put to the fire (or whatever that saying is), I’d have to say DS had the more solid ‘5’.  This is a clear win because The Great Lorenzo was a wildly more dynamic character than Bill, who is really kind of flat (but still a fun guy to read about).  Also DS’s Martians were pretty awesome dudes.

DS: M of the P
 So there it is.  When it comes to Heinlein’s 1950’s Hugo Winners, Double Star is the true Master of the Precious and Farmer in the Sky is just a stupid, fat Hobbit.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...