My copy from our library |
Stats
Double Star by Robert A. Heinlein
243 pages
Normal book format
When I began this project, I told myself that I would avoid giving
a synopsis of every book I read. I don’t
need to reproduce something that is already available on the interweb. Instead I try to write about topics that are
less frequently discussed, to get below the surface. So far, I think I’ve probably failed at both
of these goals. I promise I’ll try
harder.
In any case, because I’ve focused on issues or topics that are
mostly overlooked, you might have a wildly different opinion of some of these
books than I have. When you do, I want
to hear about it.
In this week’s book, there is really only one topic that I want to
bring up and unfortunately any discussion of it will necessitate giving away
the ending. Though I will do my best to
artfully dance around giving out too many details, if this is one you want to
read, skip to the bottom for my recommendation.
Secrets
Are Back
It makes no sense that this book was so good. The premise of this book has been done so
many times, though this book predates all the iterations I’m aware of. The basic idea is pretty identifiable; a
politician goes missing at a critical juncture his campaign. The closest confidants of said politician
find an uncanny replacement who ends up doing an amazing job of impersonating
the politician and fools everyone. I’ve
never really cared much for this story before, but there were some differences
this time. First, this story really
reminded me of Mad Men. ‘Nuff said. ‘Nuff.
The
Great Lorenzo
Early in the book, as Lorenzo (the main character and
impersonator) describes his father, he describes him as a severe man who was a stern
teacher of the dramatic arts. References
to his father are peppered throughout the rest of the book. In the beginning he mentions in passing that
his father was not very forgiving or complimentary but it is clear that most of
his attitudes, opinions and decisions are informed by his father’s influence. In each instance though, reference to his
father usually just serves to give context to something he’s done and never
gives the feeling that there is anything deeper going on.
At first, Lorenzo resents having taken the job. As the book progresses though, he finds
himself falling into his role, even when he had no need to be in
character. Then toward the end, after he
had come to believe in what he was doing, he is given the opportunity to visit
the man he is impersonating (John Joseph Bonforte) and refuses. He justifies himself by saying that he didn’t
want his only memory of the man to be one of a weak, sick old man when he was
supposed to think of him as a powerful political figure. He goes on to explain that this is the very
reason he didn’t attend his Father’s funeral; he didn’t want his memory of his
father to be that of a corpse.
His excuse is believable though so I was still caught off guard
(so was Lorenzo) when Lorenzo finally does meet the ‘real’ Bonforte at the
party following their political campaign. Bonforte looked exactly like Lorenzo’s father!
Bonforte though is kind, gentle and is genuinely stunned by the quality
of Lorenzo’s “performance.” When Lorenzo
is shortly thereafter asked to remain in his role for the rest of his life, he
immediately answers negatively, but in
Bonforte’s voice. Wow.
There was no internal discussion about Lorenzo having some
realization about his father or his childhood or anything, it was just there
for people to pick up on it or miss it entirely. The most forthright discussion of the topic
Lorenzo has came in his concluding remarks and they represent the reflection
of a tired man who has spent his life pretending to be someone else.
I
have never regretted my lost profession.
In a way, I have not lost it; Willem was right. There is other applause besides handclapping
and there is always the warm glow of a good performance. I have tried, I suppose, to create the
perfect work of art. Perhaps I have not
fully succeeded—but I think my father would rate it as a “good performance.”
Chapter 10
This was easily the saddest (or happiest, I suppose) moment as
well as the most emotionally subtle and complex part of the book. I love when an author pulls off subtlety so
it was pretty much speaking directly to me.
I finished the book with a smile.
Recommendation
Double star is really amazing for its
ability to deal with an issue that is done often and often done poorly. Even for Heinlein, it is pretty uncommon to
not be force-fed whatever he feels is the moral of the story. For the most part, I think the book is just a
short and fun book to read. I enjoyed it
quite a bit and finished it pretty quickly too, but it was also, for everything
that was good about it, exceedingly forgettable.
I use the HEP score so that I don’t just constantly compare each
new book to all the rest. I try to judge
the book on its own merits. With that in
mind, I feel compelled to note that this was the most fun book of the first
three. In the words of Lloyd Christmas, “I
like it a lot.”
HEP SCORE
Universe: 3/5 (He describes Martians just enough to kick start
your imagination)
Social/Political Climate: 5/5
Dialogue: 4/5 (Heinlein’s characters are always witty and fun)
Scientific Wonders: 2/5 (There were a few mentions, but they took
a back seat)
Characters: 5/5
Overall 19/25
This week’s book is The Demolished Man by Alfred Bester. I know nothing about it and I’ve never read
anything by this author so it should be fun.
Next week’s book is Farenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. This time it is definitely not a false
alarm. I’m actually going to be reading
it next week. This will be my first
re-reading and I’m not sure if that will work in the book’s favor or not.
Just wanted to say those are GREAT goals you mention at the beginning. So many reviews are just synopses...I love reviews that look at more unusual aspects.
ReplyDelete