Stats
Foundation’s Edge by Isaac Asimov
Audiobook
narrated by Scott Brick
1983 Hugo
Award Winner
Got it
from: Public Library
16h 19m
Anyone who
has read any part of the Foundation Trilogy is aware of the engrossing and
never ending battle of intricacies between Harry Seldon’s First and Second Foundations. Just imagine the effect of the introduction
of a third group, one consisting of an even more mentally powerful population,
one that is free to operate outside of The
Seldon Plan. In Foundation’s Edge, Asimov does just that and the effect
is a threat on the very existence of the First and Second Foundations.
“I have
this gift of coming to a conclusion on the basis of almost nothing”
The
central conflict throughout the third and fourth installments of the Foundation
Series takes place between the opposing physical scientists of the First
Foundation and the mentalic/intuitionist Second Foundation, both of which are
integral to the Seldon Plan. Foundation’s Edge adds a new element which exists
outside The Plan. The universe of the Foundation
has become an interesting one in which objective knowledge takes a back seat to
the unbelievable powers of intuition and telepathy. It is a universe in which the spoken word and
physical phenomena give away less about the plot than the knotted and obscured
tendrils of logic and the mental strength and stamina of characters who are
rarely what they appear. It also makes
for a never ending staccato of extremely tense moments which are suddenly and
unexpectedly resolved by a character’s sudden and, until that moment, opaque intuition
or realization.
The idea
of a universe in which people, can utilize the powers of intuition to construe
facts from seemingly too little information on occasion gives rise to
characters who come too rapidly and too confidently to right understanding and
situations and tensions which seem to be solved by some kind of mental deus ex machina. This is an issue I have struggled with throughout
the Foundation Series and Foundation’s Edge did not
break that mold, but it was certainly toned down compared to the third
installment of the trilogy. Still, the way in which events in Foundation’s Edge are advanced so suddenly, simply by introducing some new awareness
or piece of information that readers never could have been privy to, started to
potentially grate on me near the end.
“I was
just about to tell our guest the story of eternity”
By the
time this quote was delivered, I was already well on my way to solidifying my biggest
concern about this book. Yes, I
struggled with the way in which characters suddenly come to knowledge without a
hint to the readers, but all-in-all I didn’t really have too much heartburn
about it. My real complaint though is
that it seemed Asimov was trying to do way to damn much in Foundation’s Edge.
I would have been happy to learn of the anti-mules and go through the
process of both Foundations looking for them, but Foundation’s Edge touches on about a million other pretty major topics. This is not to say that Asimov didn’t make
robots, the origin of humanity, FTL travel, etc. all fun, but it made for a
fairly quick treatment of each and the tying up of all those elements in the
end felt a little shaky and started to lose my attention.
Actually,
that’s not much of a complaint is it? I
do have a better complaint (or would that be worse?), but it’s in the form of a
spoiler, so read on with caution:
<<SPOILER:
Bliss was a difficult character for me.
I had predicted the possibility that she wasn’t human as soon as she
avoided the question, but then the issue was left alone until the very
end. The question about who or what she
really was, was then overshadowed by her extreme objectification (and the same
issue would apply to Novy as well), and I had basically forgotten about the
issue until the end. Probably not the
best treatment of some possibly very cool characters and I was definitely
disappointed. I also wondered if I might
have taken more from Bliss had I read any of Asimov’s robot stories. Asimov himself suggests them as companion pieces
in the afterword so maybe I’ll be more excited about her after I get to some of
those. Any thoughts about Bliss for
those of you who’ve read this? >>
Recommendation
Written almost
30 years after the Foundation Trilogy, the fourth book was still, for the most
part, unintelligible from the first three.
Perhaps the effect was aided by the fact that I listened to books 3 and
4 as audiobooks and Scott Bricks read them both. Whatever the case, I think it’s fair to say
that if you’re a fan of the Foundation Trilogy, you’ll enjoy Foundation’s Edge
too. I haven’t fallen in love with this
series in the same way others have, but it is certainly very good stuff!
HEP SCORE
Universe 5/5
Social/Political
Climate 5/5
Dialogue 3/5
Scientific
Wonders 5/5 (gravitics, robots, telepathy blocks…yes)
Characters
2/5
Overall
20/25
This
week’s book is Neuromancer by William
Gibson. According to the publisher the
book that brought cyberpunk to the world.
New author, new subgenre – what could go wrong?
Next
week’s book is The Fountains of Paradise
by Arthur C. Clarke. I have read two of
Clarke’s novels. One was okay, the other
was pretty great. Where will this one
fall?
It sounds like you read the first three Foundation novels before Edge. From your review, it sounds like this is necessary. Do you remember having any thoughts on whether Edge is stand-alone, or if it requires reading the first 3 to understand it?
ReplyDeleteActually, of the first four novels, I'd say this is least likely to stand on its own. One could certainly read it without any major issues, but the other books are even more accessible without having read the others. He tends to recap when necessary so theoretically, starting in the middle might be fine. That being said, I would never suggest skipping around this series. While the stories are coherent separately, there's a philosophical thread that connects them all and skipping around would result in missing out on the way Asimov builds up the issues throughout the whole series.
ReplyDelete