Bar-code: FAIL |
Stats
Where Late the Sweet Birds Sang by Kate Wilhelm
1977 Hugo
Award Winner
Got it
from: Public Library
254 Pages
The world
is at war and politicians are leading everyone to a pit of chaos and
destruction. Fortunately a very skilled
family of scientists sees the writing on the wall and decides to take action to
save their family and loved ones. Of
course they respond to the challenge of ensuring their survival by turning to
their very unique skill set, namely, the cloning of organic tissue.
The copy
from the back cover of my copy promised it would be “one of the best treatments
of cloning in SF” and I’m here to tell
you that statement wasn’t far off the mark.
A book in three parts and an epilogue
Like A Canticle for Leibowitz, WLSBS was written in three parts, with significant
lapses of time between them and just as with ACL, the story in each of these parts can be wildly
different from one part to the next. In
this case, it meant we heard the story of a different person with different
problems and while I didn’t love it right away, by the time I reached Part III
they had all coalesced and the whole turned out a great deal better than the
sum of its parts. Part I and II were
okay but felt unfinished. Part III was
magnificent. Mark turns out to be one of
the most successfully seriously grave and
seriously funny tricksters I’ve read in a long while. I wish the epilogue had been edited out but I
don’ want to give up too much so I’ll
just say this book builds up steam like a locomotive only to be derailed by a
penny on the track some kid put there to be funny.
An American story
A © of 1976
means everything for WLSBS. It places it immediately after the passage of
numerous federal environmental policies like the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water
Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and the Safe
Drinking Water Act to name just a few.
By this time, Silent
Spring had been a part of the national consciousness for over 1o
years. Aldo Leopold had taught us to “think like a mountain”. America had a renewed interest keeping our
wilderness wild, keeping it clean and making sure our children wouldn’t forget
the sound of birds singing. We also had
a renewed interest in transcendental thinking about the environment. Around the time Wilhelm was writing this
book, Environmental NGO’s were enjoying some of their highest membership and
charitable giving they would see for many, many years. By 1976 the Hugos had apparently turned their
attention from the inky-black sky to our inky-green forests.
I caught
this in WLSBS in a
couple of ways but most prevalently in Mark’s character, his worries and his
actions. Mark thrived in the wild. He loved the forest and the river and not
only for his ability to seek solitude there.
It was a place for renewal and becoming one with the place he
lived. He was like a Henry David Thoreau
of the future. He needed the wild if he
wanted to survive and he was trying his damnedest to remind the others that
they needed it too. When he scouted the
remains of the big cities, he felt oppressed and not just for the symbol of how
far civilization had fallen. The cities
epitomized the artificiality of the people in the valley.
But he
also understood that there was something in the forest that he could never have
and respected and feared it. He knew the
forest needed to exist on its own inaccessible to civilization and that it
helps keep our sanity. And in all these
ways it seemed to me a book of its time.
Well, maybe this is just a case of me cramming two ill-fitting and
unrelated puzzle pieces together, but if Wilhelm wasn’t intentionally saying
it, I’d like to believe I’m not the only one to have picked up on it.
Recommendation
This is an
apocalyptic/post-apocalyptic novel but it is quite refreshingly removed from
the usual tropes about urban survival, fear of the other, contagion or The
Bomb. Of course there has been fallout
and everyone is worried about survival but the idea that a group of well-stocked
and able doctors would worry more about the survival of their children’s
children’s children was something new and different and cool. I didn’t feel the actual storytelling offered
much to get excited about, but the concept alone carried it pretty far.
HEP SCORE
Universe 3/5
Social/Political
Climate 4/5
Dialogue 4/5
Scientific
Wonders 3/5
Characters
5/5
Overall
19/25
Another roll of the die…
This
week’s book is The Left Hand of Darkness
by Ursula K. Le Guin. This one has been
highly recommended so I expect good things.
Next
week’s book is To Your Scattered Bodies Go
by Philip José Farmer. I’ve seen pretty
mixed reviews but I like the sound of the title so…
I have a soft-spot for this book. I certainly is a product of its time when gas shortages and talk of a coming ice age where fervent, not to mention the fears of a nuclear apocalypse. I was particularly drawn to the themes about individuality. Having had our first child I found the subtle reminder of human uniqueness engrossing. To be different is often a very sacred thing, and as parents we can forget that.
ReplyDeleteThe individuality theme was also very interesting, I wish I could just talk forever about all these books, but I don't think the world deserves that much punishment.
DeleteIt was also somewhat of a timely issue for me here in Florida where standardized tests have always been somewhat controversial and this year a huge majority failed after some changes to the grading requirements (other issues too but...). With recent events like that the idea that the brothers and sisters couldn't respond to changes and only knew how to regurgitate information really spoke to me.
Your point is well taken too. I see so many parents who expect their children to be just like them. I don't think I'm like that myself but then sometimes Emmeline can do something that brings out those latent expectations in me. Erg... but good book though.