Talk about how much you like science fiction in mixed
company and you’re bound to rapidly descend from whatever echelon of the social
ladder you thought you occupied. I think
this is because there are two groups of science fiction novels; literature
and trash.
I think of it as the difference between the sci-fi channel
movies and 2001: A Space Odyssey. In many cases, science fiction can tell us
something really significant about humanity’s place in the world or tries to
make sense out of existence and death and the intricacies of our relationships. Of course, there are stories like Star Wars, which
for all the flashing lights would have us believe it is telling us something, but
are really just a façade held up by cardboard.
The difference is more often than not, too subtle for most
to grasp. For example, The Mule (last week’s book) was borderline trash to me because
in the instant it could have made profound statements about the human condition
or even the invented science of psychohistory, the character called the mule
revealed his motivation for galactic warfare to be revenge for society shunning
him as a child. Come on.
Science Fiction literature does not enjoy the mainstream
popularity it deserves. I believe it to
be legitimate but I think people see in the genre what they see in horror films, that is to say, only the surface.
Keep fighting. This is a serious literature that is too often obscured by junk. I worked in a bookstore for 10 years, and it took me a long time to convince my superiors to let me promote sci-fi more. Eventually I turned it into the best-selling sci-fi section in the chain. People just need to give it a chance.
ReplyDelete