Stats
Rainbows End
by Vernor Vinge
2007 Hugo
Award Winner
Read by Eric
Conger
Got it
from: Own it
14h 46m
After
medical treatments make it possible for Alzheimer patients to completely
recover, Robert Gu finds himself in a pretty intensive rehab program. He isn’t the person he used to be, and he
doesn’t live in the same world either.
He was a famous poet in a world similar to ours. Now he is no one,
learning how to “sming” and how to interface with computers. It is during his rehab at Fairmont High
School, that Robert becomes embroiled in a conspiracy plot to end all
conspiracy plots.
Multiple realities
So there
is one reality where an author has an uncanny ability to tap into the most
salient features of some really complex issues.
In Rainbows End, Vinge reminds
us how well he capitalizes on our most deep-rooted fears and our most lofty scientific achievements. In beginning this book, I had figured Rainbows End for another goldmine of Vinge-y,
SF goodness…but I didn’t labor under that delusion for long.
I was
excited by the opening computer/chemical warfare plot. I was reminded of the cyber-attacks on
nuclear facilities in Iran going back a couple of years and I thought Vinge
might have been preparing to go bigger. I
was strapping myself in for Vinge’s brand of ultra-paranoia. It harkened to the message boards in A Fire Upon the Deep and man…I ate that
stuff up.
In the
first chapter, “Mr. Rabbit visits Barcelona” (Sweet title. I loved it), Vinge
was poised to capitalize on how compelling and/or dangerous the convergence of several
technological advancements could be in a world where anonymous access is taken
to just about every extreme, and I was ready to follow him wherever he wanted
to go.
Taken
separately, individual elements of Vinge’s future were awe inspiring, but the
other reality of Rainbows End is that
as these elements come together and the story starts to drag on and on, the
final product doesn’t seem equal the sum of its parts.
I almost
think this is worse than having just written a story that falls flat altogether. Vinge touches on all the right topics and
sets himself up for a home run, while everyone is batting blindfolded. Instead of just striking out, as authors do
sometimes, in Rainbows End, Vinge lets
go of the bat and injures some unsuspecting kid in the stands hoping to catch a
foul ball. And I think I might have been
that kid, because this one left me confused.
While I
admit to exclaiming audibly at the coolness
of this or that bit of tech or social construction quite frequently, I didn’t
much enjoy the overall story. Tension?
Not so much. Compelling characters?
Nope. Cool world, but there was never
any reason to be in it.
Recommendation
Consistent
with my
last Vinge experience, Rainbows End
incorporates a plethora of themes both scientific and psychological, and
fantastically so, but it also lacks a lot. Comparing the two Hugo winners that
I’m familiar with, Rainbows End feels
like it occupies a specific place and time in a way that A Fire Upon the Deep did not.
I don’t have much interest in re-reading this one, but I am curious how
it will hold up to another ten years or so.
I might be wrong; it could be like good wine.
I actually
started this review several weeks ago and before I chucked everything I had and
started again, I noticed that this audiobook was only fourteen hours. Not terribly long as far as audiobooks go,
but it felt longer than some of the longest I’ve gone through so far. I guess even though the concepts were
interesting, they only had the power to captivate for so long. Perhaps I’ll enjoy the shorter stories that Rainbows End was based on instead.
HEP SCORE
Universe 4/5
Social/Political
Climate 5/5
Dialogue 3/5
Scientific
Wonders 4/5
Characters
3/5
Overall
19/25
That's quite sad to hear, as I was also hoping to hear that this book would be more Vinge-y SF goodness. At least I still have A Deepness in the Sky on my list of books to read.
ReplyDeleteI didn't enjoy this book either. I agree with you that it began great, but the progression of the double cross just left me bored and confused. The plight of Robert also had a lot of potential, but he was so obnoxious. I've spent my life trying to distance myself from toxic people. I didn't want to have to read about one. Sure the technology was cool, and the blur between reality and the virtual was fun at times, but not enough to redeem the characters or the story as a whole.
ReplyDeleteDitto for me. I found it very disappointing, especially after "A Fire Upon the Deep" and "Deepness in the Sky." Both are far superior efforts than "Rainbow." I did enjoy the world building and glimpse into what a true technocratic society might look like, and also found particular delight in the blur between reality and the virtual. I agree with Stephen here. The characters were juvenile and certainly evoke no connection. The novel could have been a lot more mature.
ReplyDeleteIt's not the weakest Hugo winner by a long country mile (that must go to Hominids), but both "Blindsight" and "Eifelheim" were stronger works.